Customer Reviews (10)
Angela O.
Solid choice for collaboration
I switched to GitHub after trying GitLab and Bitbucket, mainly because GitHub’s community and integrations felt more robust for my projects. GitLab had some neat built-in CI/CD features, but I found it a bit clunkier to navigate. Bitbucket was fine, but the smaller user base and less extensive open-source support made collaboration tougher. GitHub’s interface just flows better and the pull request system is easier to manage, which really helped speed up our team's workflow.
Brianna P.
Good tools but pricey tiers
GitHub's pricing feels a bit steep if you're just a small team or individual developer. The free tier covers a lot, but once you need advanced features, the cost really adds up quickly. That said, the platform's tools have saved us time on collaboration and version control, so in that sense, it pays off. Still, for what you get at the higher tiers, I expected a bit more flexibility or added value.
Fletcher L.
Smooth setup with minor hiccups
Getting started with GitHub was surprisingly quick—I had my repos set up and linked in less than 20 minutes. The onboarding guides were clear enough, though I did have to google a couple of git commands to feel fully comfortable. The learning curve is definitely there if you’re new to version control, but the overall setup didn’t feel overwhelming. Would’ve been nice if the interface was a bit more intuitive for first timers, but nothing too frustrating.
Peregrine P.
Good value for teamwork
The pricing feels fair considering how much time it saves me and my team. For the features we use, it’s definitely worth the cost and has paid off in smoother collaboration.
Stuart J.
Great for team collaboration
Our team of about 8 developers started using GitHub to better manage our projects and code reviews. Getting everyone on board was a bit slow at first since some preferred older methods, but after a couple of weeks, the collaboration really improved. Having all our work centralized and versioned made it easier to track changes and catch issues early. The one downside is sometimes merge conflicts get tricky when multiple people work on the same files simultaneously.
Laura P.
Great for team collaboration
Our team of about 8 devs started using GitHub a few months ago, and honestly, getting everyone on board took some nudging since some were used to different tools. But once we settled in, collaboration got way smoother—PRs and issue tracking really helped keep things organized. Only downside is sometimes the UI feels a bit cluttered when juggling multiple repos.
Katelyn H.
Good PRs, messy issues
The pull request review system is really handy for collaboration, but I find the issue tracking a bit clunky and hard to organize when there are many open items.
Justin M.
Saved our collaboration process
Our team was drowning in messy version control conflicts during rapid development, but GitHub's pull request system made it way easier to review and merge changes smoothly.
Kimberly R.
Smooth and straightforward setup
Getting started with GitHub was surprisingly smooth. The onboarding guides were clear enough that I had my first repo up and running within 15 minutes. There was a slight learning curve around branching and pull requests, but the interface helped me figure it out quickly. Overall, the setup didn't slow me down, which made the whole process pretty painless.
Mackenzie P.
Overcomplicated and frustrating
Honestly, GitHub feels way more complicated than it needs to be. I was hoping for something that just lets me manage code easily, but the interface keeps throwing me off and it’s not very intuitive. Plus, the whole pull request and merge process sometimes just feels like a headache instead of helping. Not the worst, but definitely not the smooth experience I expected.